Lawrence v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2003
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 31 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 33 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently March 2020 · most notably 859 So. 2d 495 - Rivera v. State (2003), 934 So. 2d 1100 - Simmons v. State (2006)
1 federal appellate · 31 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Apprendi v. New Jersey · Ring v. Arizona · 491 So. 2d 1129 - State v. DiGuilio · 283 So. 2d 1 - State v. Dixon
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 33 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[T]he concept of `opening the door' allows the admission of otherwise inadmissible testimony to `qualify, explain, or limit' testimony or evidence previously admitted.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“Another page of notes provides a list of items and tasks, some of which had been checked off or scribbled out. That list includes”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“would have been incomplete and misleading”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.