Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 846 So. 2d 765 - Thomas v. De St. James

846 So. 2d 765 - Thomas v. De St. James’s Empirical Analysis

2003

Citation profile

1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
December 2005
most recently cited

1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Smith v. OUR LADY OF LAKE HOSP. · 660 So. 2d 7 - Resweber v. Haroil Const. Co. · Townley v. City of Iowa · Walker v. Kroop · 720 So. 2d 398 - Two Feathers Enterprise v. First Nat. Bank

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A. It shall be unlawful for any person, for the purpose of obtaining or defeating any benefit or payment under the provisions of this Chapter, either for himself or for any other person, to willfully make |4a false statement or representation. [[Image here]] E. Any employee violating this Section shall, upon determination by workers’ compensation judge, forfeit any right to compensation benefits under this Chapter.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.