Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 846 SW2D 5 - Womack v. Redden

Womack v. Redden’s Empirical Analysis

1992

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
March 2019
most recently cited

4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently March 2019

4 state decisions

30199220002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Plas-Tex, Inc. v. U.S. Steel Corp. · McGalliard v. Kuhlmann · Burnett v. Motyka · Runnells v. Firestone · International Bank NA v. Morales

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[a]bandonment of a homestead requires both the cessation or discontinuance of use of the property as a homestead, coupled with the intent to permanently abandon the homestead.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “(c) In those counties where there is a statutory probate court, county court at law, or other statutory court exercising the jurisdiction of a probate court, all applications, petitions and motions regarding probate and administrations shall be filed and heard in such comts and the constitutional county court, rather than in the district courts, unless otherwise provided by the legislature, and the judges of such courts may hear any of such matters sitting for the judge of any of such courts. In contested matters, the judge of the constitutional county court may on his own motion, and shall on the motion of any party to the proceeding, transfer the proceeding to the statutory probate court, county court at law, or other statutory court exercising the jurisdiction of a probate court, which may then hear the proceeding as if originally filed in such court. [[Image here]] (e) All courts exercising original probate jurisdiction shall have the power to hear all matters incident to an estate.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.