Rhem v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1992
Citation profile
6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
December 1996
most recently cited
6 state decisions
Appellate journey
reviewedthe decision below (from Texas 184th Judicial District Court)
Relationships
Relies on Helms v. State · Lemmons v. State · Morris v. State · Davis v. State · Lerma v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“In Davis , we held that the relevant portions of Rule 40(b)(1) should be read as follows: “... in order to prosecute an appeal for a (1) nonjurisdictional defect [occurring before or after the plea], or (2) error that occurred prior to entry of the plea, the notice shall state that the trial court granted permission to appeal or shall specify that those matters were raised by written motion and ruled on before trial....””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Rhem v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.