Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 847 F.2d 1 - United States v. Glantz

United States v. Glantz’s Empirical Analysis

847 F.2d 1 · 1988

Citation profile

34
cited by 34 later decisions
2
states following
September 2016
most recently cited

21 federal appellate · 4 district · 3 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 34 later decisions — most recently September 2016 · most notably State v. Hines (1998), United States v. Doherty (1989)

21 federal appellate · 4 district · 3 state decisions

1501988199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1623

Relies on Sinclair v. United States · Bronston v. United States · United States v. Glenn · Vitello v. United States · United States v. Medina

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 34 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the jury cannot be allowed to guess at the witness' understanding of a clearly ambiguous question”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “The principles underlying the Bronston decision also bar perjury convictions for arguably untrue answers to vague or ambiguous questions when there is insufficient evidence of how they were understood by the witness. United States v. Eddy, 737 F.2d 564, 567 (6th Cir. 1984); United States v. Tonelli, 577 F.2d 194, 200 (3d Cir. 1978).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “all defenses rely to a great extent on the ingenuity of counsel.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.