Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 847 F.2d 549 - Stringer v. Huet

Stringer v. Huet’s Empirical Analysis

847 F.2d 549 · 1988

Citation profile

115
cited by 115 later decisions
2
states following
June 2019
most recently cited

35 federal appellate · 3 district · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 115 later decisions — most recently June 2019 · most notably Schwartz v. United States (1992), 1993-1 Hillis Motors Inc v. Hawaii Automobile Dealers' Association (1993)

35 federal appellate · 3 district · 2 state decisions

6001988199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 11 U.S.C. § 362 · 28 U.S.C. § 157 · 28 U.S.C. § 158

Relies on United Sav. Assn. of Tex. v. Timbers of Inwood Forest Associates, Ltd. · Griggs v. Provident Consumer Discount Co. · Kalb v. Feuerstein · Kalb v. Feuerstein · Bankers Life & Casualty Co. v. Crenshaw

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 115 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Congress clearly intended the automatic stay to be quite broad. Exemptions to the stay, on the other hand, should be read narrowly to secure the broad grant of relief to the debtor.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
    e.g. In re Fulton · Grinspan v. Grinspan (In re Grinspan)
  2. “attempt a repayment . . . plan, or simply . . . be relieved of the financial pressures that drove him into bankruptcy.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
    e.g. Schwartz v. United States · Fritz v. Washington Mutual (In Re Fritz)
  3. “the collection of a domestic support obligation from property that is not property of the estate.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
    e.g. Grinspan v. Grinspan (In re Grinspan) · Carver v. Carver

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.