United States v. Stemm’s Empirical Analysis
847 F.2d 636 · 1988
Citation profile
33 federal appellate · 4 district · 5 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 50 later decisions — most recently June 2012 · most notably United States v. Goldfaden (1992), United States v. Hand (1990)
33 federal appellate · 4 district · 5 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Santobello v. New York · Williams v. People of State of New York · Gilbert v. First National Bank of Jackson · Starnes v. United States · Nations v. Morris
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 50 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“condone the Government accomplishing through indirect means what it promised not to do directly.”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage“Disclosure of information as to the nature of the offense and each defendant's role is proper and within the Government's duty to provide, despite a promise that the Government would make no recommendation as to sentence.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage“Where the government obtains a guilty plea predicated in any significant degree on a promise or agreement with the prosecuting attorney, such promise must be fulfilled to maintain the integrity of the plea.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.