D.O. v. Glisson’s Empirical Analysis
847 F.3d 374 · 2017
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Relationships
Applies 20 U.S.C. § 1232G (Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act of 1974) · 42 U.S.C. § 1396A (§ 1902 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act)) · 42 U.S.C. § 670 (§ 470 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 671 (§ 471 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 672 (§ 472 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 674 (§ 474 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 675 (§ 475 of the Social Security Act of 1935)
Relies on Cannon v. University of Chicago · Maine v. Thiboutot · Alexander v. Sandoval · Wilder v. Virginia Hospital Assn. · Gonzaga University v. Doe
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“so 'vague and amorphous' that its enforcement would strain judicial competence”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“on behalf of each child who has been removed from the home of a relative.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“an amount equal to the Federal medical assistance percentage”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.