Doermer v. Callen’s Empirical Analysis
847 F.3d 522 · 2017
Citation profile
5 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1332 (Class Action Fairness Act of 2005) · 42 U.S.C. § 1997E
Relies on Erie Co v. Tompkins · Harlow v. Fitzgerald · Foman v. Davis · Pearson v. Callahan · Federal Deposit Insurance v. Meyer
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the Indiana Supreme Court would decide them today.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“is to decide issues of Indiana state law”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.