Sandoval v. Yates’s Empirical Analysis
847 F.3d 697 · 2017
Citation profile
3 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3559 · 18 U.S.C. § 924 · 21 U.S.C. § 802 (§ 102 of the Controlled Substances Act) · 21 U.S.C. § 841 (§ 401 of the Controlled Substances Act) · 21 U.S.C. § 846 (§ 406 of the Controlled Substances Act) · 8 U.S.C. § 1101 (§ 101 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1227 (§ 237 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1252 (§ 242 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))
Relies on Shepard v. United States · Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Ventura · Descamps v. United States · Lopez v. Gonzales · GLK, Inc. v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“any Federal or State offense classified by applicable Federal or State law as a felony.” 21 U.S.C. § 802 (13). But 18 U.S.C. § 3559 (a) controls for immigration purposes. See Moncrieffe, 133 S.Ct. at 1683 ; see also Carachuri-Rosendo, 560 U.S. at 567 , 130 S.Ct. 2577 . 5 . We do not consider whether solicitation to commit murder is an aggravated felony, 6 . This was exemplified in State ex rel. Juvenile Department of Union County v. Krieger, 177 Or.App. 156 , 33 P.3d 351 , 352 (2001), in which the Oregon appellate court affirmed”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Sandoval v. Sessions“Only divisible statutes are subject to the modified categorical approach.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“their school. See id. All of these requests were rejected and the minor”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Sandoval v. Sessions
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.