Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 847 F.3d 705 - Manley v. Rowley

Manley v. Rowley’s Empirical Analysis

847 F.3d 705 · 2017

Citation profile

11
cited by 11 later decisions
1
states following
January 2026
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1997E

Relies on Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. · Celotex Corporation v. Catrett H · Hudson v. McMillian · Jones v. Bock · Woodford v. Ngo

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) whether the original judge would reasonably be expected upon remand to have substantial difficulty in putting out of his or her mind previously expressed views or findings determined to be erroneous or based on evidence that must be rejected, (2) whether reassignment is advisable to preserve the appearance of justice, and (3) whether reassignment would entail waste and duplication out of proportion to any gain in preserving appearance of fairness.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “the mere self-serving nature of testimony permits a court to discount that testimony where it states only conclusions and not facts that would be admissible evidence. Id. (internal citations, quotation marks, and alterations omitted). Soto's statement recites facts, not legal conclusions, and creates a genuine dispute of material fact.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[A] court ruling on a motion for summary judgment may not engage in credibility determinations or the weighing of evidence, as those are functions reserved for the jury.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.