Packgen v. Berry Plastics Corp.’s Empirical Analysis
847 F.3d 80 · 2017
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 2 district ·
Relationships
Relies on Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. · i4i Ltd. Partnership v. Microsoft Corp. · Ambrosini v. Labarraque · Milward v. Acuity Specialty Products Group, Inc. · Paul Cummings v. The Standard Register Company Paul Cummings
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“To be admissible under the state-of-mind exception, 'a declaration ... must mirror a state of mind, which, in light of all the circumstances, including proximity in time, is reasonably likely to have been the same condition existing at the material time.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“Packgen's witnesses knew the declarants and testified that all declarants were decision-makers at their respective refineries.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“existence of other methods of gathering facts does not mean that the facts [Aronberg] relied upon were insufficient”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.