Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 847 FSUPP 838 - Klein v. Boeing Co.

Klein v. Boeing Co.’s Empirical Analysis

1994

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
1
states following
February 2010
most recently cited

4 federal appellate · 3 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently February 2010

4 federal appellate · 3 state decisions

60199420002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 29 U.S.C. § 160 (§ 10 of the National Labor Relations Act) · 42 U.S.C. § 12101 (§ 2 of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990) · 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 701 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964) · 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 703 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964)

Relies on Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. · International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. United States · DelCostello v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters · Tw Electrical Service Inc Nn v. Pacific Electrical Contractors Association · Rauer v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “must fail as a matter of law because whether or not [he] can show that he suffered from an 'abnormal condition,' he has not presented any evidence which indicates that Boeing discharged him because of any abnormal condition”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “Klein never asserted this claim prior to his opposition to Boeing's motion for summary judgment, nor has he moved to amend his complaint to add such a claim. Thus, this claim is not properly before the court.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “[d]ischarge of an employee for violation of a workplace rule does not constitute discrimination based upon an employee's alleged disability.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.