Abdullah v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2006
Citation profile
5
cited by 5 later decisions
2
states following
January 2019
most recently cited
5 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Jones v. State · Carpenter v. State · Johnson v. Cornett · 182 Ind. App. 697 - James v. Board of Commissioners · Rhone v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[There are numerous other means [besides a signed judgment] by which the State may elect to prove a prior conviction ... including but certainly not limited to copies of sentencing orders, case chronologies, plea agreements, testimony from prosecutors or others involved in or witness to the prior conviction, or transcripts from the convicting court's proceedings.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Stewart“standing alone, an unsigned abstract fails to represent the trial court's final judgment and, therefore, is insufficient to prove a prior conviction for purposes of proving Abdullah's statuses as a serious violent felon and a habitual offender.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Woods v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.