Holder v. State’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

78 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 78 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “As we consider reasonableness based upon the particular facts of each case, the Court also gives Art. 1, § 11 a liberal construction to angle in favor of protection for individuals from unreasonable intrusions on privacy.”

   7 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
   e.g. Jonathan D. Carpenter v. State of Indiana · Wilkins v. State

2. “(1) the degree of concern, suspicion, or knowledge that a violation had occurred, (2) the degree of intrusion the method of the search or seizure imposes on the citizen's ordinary activities, and (3) the extent of law enforcement needs.”

   5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
   e.g. Shotts v. State · TS v. State

3. “[a]mong the exigencies that may properly excuse the warrant requirement are threats to the lives and safety of officers and others and the imminent destruction of evidence.”

   3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
   e.g. Shakur Johnson v. State of Indiana · Morgan K. Govan v. State of Indiana