Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 847 P2D 66 - Pappert v. Sargent

Pappert v. Sargent’s Empirical Analysis

1993

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
2
states following
May 2013
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Malvo Ex Rel. Malvo v. J. C. Penney Co. · Sea Lion Corp. v. Air Logistics of Alaska, Inc. · Parker v. Northern Mixing Co. · Martens v. Metzgar · Sprinkle v. Wellborn.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “If the contract is made on fair terms and the other party has no reason to know of the incompetency, performance in whole or in part may so change the situation that the parties cannot be restored to their previous positions or may otherwise render avoidance inequitable. The contract then ceases to be voidable.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.