¶1Affirmed without prejudice. See Leichtman v. Singletary, 674 So.2d 889 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996); Finley v. State, 394 So.2d 215, 216 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981)(“[T]he remedy of habeas corpus is not available as a substitute for post-conviction relief under Rule 3.850, Fla. R.Crim. P.”).
847 So. 2d 1053
Thurston v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided June 4, 2003
District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2003-06-04
Cited by 1 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently November 2003
Relies on 674 So. 2d 889 - Leichtman v. Singletary · Finley v. State
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 2003-06-04
View the full empirical analysis of this case →