Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 847 So. 2d 26 - Fuller v. Baggette

847 So. 2d 26 - Fuller v. Baggette’s Empirical Analysis

2003

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
October 2009
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 595 So. 2d 624 - Lima v. Schmidt · 607 So. 2d 532 - Bustamento v. Tucker · Nicholas v. Allstate Ins. Co. · Elevating Boats, Inc. v. St. Bernard Parish · Smith v. Lincoln General Hospital

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Actions against any person who has served as curator of a vacant succession or as administrator, testamentary executor, or dative testamentary executor of a succession in this state, or against the surety on his bond, arising out of any act the succession representative, as such, may have done or failed to do, are prescribed by two years, reckoning from the day of the judgment homologating the final account. This prescription shall not be suspended or interrupted because of the incapacity of the person who might bring the action, reserving to him his recourse against his tutor or curator. This prescription does not apply to actions for the recovery of any funds or other property misappropriated by the succession representative nor to actions for any amount not paid in accordance with the proposed payments shown on the final account.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.