Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 847 SW2D 134 - State v. Law

State v. Law’s Empirical Analysis

1993

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
August 1998
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on United States v. Ross · Florida v. Jimeno · State v. Parkhurst · State v. Burkhardt · State v. Brown

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “We think that it was objectively reasonable for the police to conclude that the general consent to search respondents ear included consent to search containers within that car which might bear drugs. A reasonable person may be expected to know that narcotics are generally carried in some form of a container. “Contraband goods rarely are strewn across the trunk or floor of a car.” The authorization to search in this case, therefore, extended beyond the surfaces of the cars interior to the paper bag lying on the cars floor.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.