Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 847 SW2D 482 - State v. Creason

State v. Creason’s Empirical Analysis

1993

Citation profile

17
cited by 17 later decisions
2
states following
December 2015
most recently cited

17 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently December 2015

17 state decisions

100199320002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Michelson v. United States · Lumpkin v. Lumpkin · State v. Sladek · State v. Harris · State v. Selle

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Nevertheless, the victim’s testimony was corroborated by her prompt complaint, first to her mother and then to Chief Boggs and to Mrs. Heurer. Evidence of the victim’s prompt complaint is corroborative evidence of a sexual assault. Additionally, Mrs. Heurer testified that the victim “was very upset with what had happened and was crying.” This corroborates and establishes that the act occurred. (citations omitted)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “How the question is framed is a factor to be considered when determining whether the question is to test the witness's credibility or has, as its purpose, to improperly show other crimes or collateral details.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “`Were you aware' and `did you know' requests personal knowledge of the witness and implies the matter inquired of as a fact when this introduction is followed by `... of the fact. ...'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.