Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 847 SW2D 521 - Cooper v. State

Cooper v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1992

Citation profile

31
cited by 31 later decisions
2
states following
September 2017
most recently cited

31 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 31 later decisions — most recently September 2017 · most notably State v. Cazes (1994), State v. Hall (1997)

31 state decisions

150199220002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Penson v. Ohio · Gregg v. Georgia · Witherspoon v. Illinois · Lockett v. Ohio

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 31 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The lawyer also has a substantial and important role to perform in raising mitigating factors both to the prosecutor initially and to the court at sentencing. This cannot effectively be done on the basis of broad general emotional appeals or on the strength of statements made to the lawyer by the defendant. Information concerning the defendant’s background, education, employment record, ... relationships, and the like, will be relevant, as will mitigating circumstances surrounding the commission of the offense itself. Investigation is essential to fulfilment of these functions.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  2. “The resulting prejudice is clear. The only testimony the jury heard at sentencing concerning appellant’s mental history and condition, including the bizarre behavior he occasionally exhibited, was that presented by his mother. As her testimony makes clear, many others could have testified concerning his behavior, the fact that others did not do so undoubtedly diminished the impact on the jury of the facts she described.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  3. “When the record shows a substantial deficiency in investigation, the normal deference afforded trial counsel's strategies is particularly inappropriate... . [This] Court will not credit a strategic choice by counsel when counsel `did not even know what evidence was available.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.