Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 848 A2D 934 - Commonwealth v. Joseph

Commonwealth v. Joseph’s Empirical Analysis

2004

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
July 2023
most recently cited

5 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently July 2023

5 state decisions

30200420102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Sherman v. United States · Ingalls v. Roosevelt County · Optimal Data Corp. v. United States · Commonwealth v. Faulkner · Commonwealth v. Duff

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “It is the uncertainty surrounding such sentences, and the disorder they can engender, that prompts their prohibition.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “An indefinitely suspended sentence is not a sanctioned sentencing alternative.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.