Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 848 F.2d 163 - Rolleston v. Eldridge

Rolleston v. Eldridge’s Empirical Analysis

848 F.2d 163 · 1988

Citation profile

16
cited by 16 later decisions
October 2013
most recently cited

7 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently October 2013

7 federal appellate ·

501988199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. Feldman · Stump v. Sparkman · Jurldine A. Donaldson v. Paul v. Clark · Clark v. Florida · Wood v. Orange County

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A judge is absolutely immune from liability for his judicial acts even if his exercise of authority is flawed by the commission of grave procedural errors.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “Even assuming that Judge Eldridge had not followed procedural rules, his action would still be within his jurisdiction.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.