Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

848 F.2d 185

Docket No. 87-6656.

Holley v. Carr

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals

Submitted: March 4, 1988. Decided: May 18, 1988.

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1988-05-18

Relies on Browder v. Director Department of Corrections of Illinois · United States v. Robinson · Riverbend Farms, Inc. v. Agricultural Labor Relations Board

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1988-05-18

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Francis Russell Holley, appellant pro se.

Rex Charles Schultz, Assistant Attorney General, for appellees.

Before K.K. HALL, JAMES DICKSON PHILLIPS and CHAPMAN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

¶1

Appellant Francis Russell Holley noted this appeal outside the 30-day appeal period established by Fed.R.App.P. 4(a)(1), and failed to move for an extension of the appeal period within the additional 30-day period provided by Fed.R.App.P. 4(a)(5). The time periods established by Fed.R.App.P. 4 are "mandatory and jurisdictional." Browder v. Director, Dep't of Corrections, 434 U.S. 257, 264 (1978) (quoting United States v. Robinson, 361 U.S. 220, 229 (1960)). Appellant's failure to note a timely appeal or to obtain an extension of the appeal period deprives this Court of jurisdiction to consider this case. See Shah v. Hutto, 722 F.2d 1167 (4th Cir.1983) (en banc), cert. denied, 466 U.S. 975 (1984). We therefore dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the dispositive issues recently have been decided authoritatively.

¶2

DISMISSED.

/848/f2d/185 · .json · Public domain