Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 848 F.2d 785 - United States v. Hooks

United States v. Hooks’s Empirical Analysis

848 F.2d 785 · 1988

Citation profile

143
cited by 143 later decisions
2
cited 2 times by the Supreme Court
14
states following
July 2022
most recently cited

95 federal appellate · 3 district · 16 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 143 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently July 2022 · most notably United States v. Angiulo (1990), United States v. Doerr (1989)

95 federal appellate · 3 district · 16 state decisions — followed in 14 states

70019881990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 371 · 18 U.S.C. § 6002 · 18 U.S.C. § 6003 · 26 U.S.C. § 7201 · 26 U.S.C. § 7206

Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · Glasser v. United States · Ohio v. Roberts · United States v. Nixon · Washington v. Texas

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 143 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “provides considerable discretion to the prosecutor, who is permitted to request immunity when 'in his judgment' it is 'necessary to the public interest.'”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “If two or more persons conspire either to commit any offense against the United States, or to defraud the United States, or any agency thereof in any manner or for any purpose, and one or more of such persons do any act to effect the object of the conspiracy, each shall be fined not more than $10,000 or imprisoned not more than five years, or both.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “(1) that defendant aided, assisted, procured, counseled, advised or caused the preparation and presentation of a return; (2) that the return was fraudulent or false as to a material matter; and (3) that the act of the defendant was willful.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.