Thorbus v. Bowen’s Empirical Analysis
848 F.2d 901 · 1988
Citation profile
10 federal appellate · 6 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 25 later decisions — most recently January 2015 · most notably 63 F. Supp. 2d 1 - Vencor Nursing Centers, L.P. v. Shalala (1999), Anderson v. Sullivan (1992)
10 federal appellate · 6 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1331 · 42 U.S.C. § 1320A (§ 1128 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 1320C (§ 1156 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 1395Y (§ 1862 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 405 (§ 205 of the Social Security Act of 1935)
Relies on Mathews v. Eldridge · Weinberger v. Salfi · Bowen v. City of New York · Dataphase Systems, Inc. v. C L Systems, Inc. · Koerpel v. Heckler
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) raise a colorable constitutional claim collateral to his substantive claim of entitlement; (2) show that he would be irreparably harmed by enforcement of the exhaustion requirement; and (3) show that the purposes of the exhaustion requirement would not be served by requiring further administrative procedures.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage“'function efficiently and ... have an opportunity to correct its own errors, to afford the parties and the courts the benefit of [the Secretary's] experience and expertise, and to compile a record [that] is adequate for judicial review.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“assume[d] without deciding that [petitioner's due process claim is] sufficiently colorable for the purposes of jurisdiction in federal court,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.