Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 848 F.2d 93 - Chathas v. Smith

Chathas v. Smith’s Empirical Analysis

848 F.2d 93 · 1988

Citation profile

30
cited by 30 later decisions
April 2017
most recently cited

21 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 30 later decisions — most recently April 2017 · most notably Wilson v. City of Chicago (1993), Thomas v. Gunter (1994)

21 federal appellate ·

1201988199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1651

Relies on Vito Matarese v. Eugene Lefevre · Joseph v. Brierton · Arthur Andersen & Co. v. Honorable Sherman G. Finesilver, Etc., State of Ohio v. Arthur Andersen & Co. · Preble v. Johnson · Bancroft Navigation Company, Ltd., Libelant-Cross v. Chadade Steamship Co., Inc. And the S.S. Yarmouth Castle, Her Engines, Etc., Respondents-Cross Libelant-Appellant v. Caribbean Cruise Lines, Inc., John E. Smith, Jr. And Passage Monies of the S.S. Yarmouth Castle

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 30 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(Br. 9 and Supp.App. 4). 2 It is true that Bankruptcy Rule 8001 and Official Form No. 35 maintain such a requirement, but neither has been mentioned in Monke's brief and therefore will not be considered here, particularly since Monke does not assert any prejudice from noncompliance. 15 Recently, this Court considered Rule 3(c) of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure, which requires that the notice of appeal to courts of appeals specify the party taking the appeal and that”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.