United States v. Jackson’s Empirical Analysis
848 F.3d 460 · 2017
Citation profile
5 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3553 · 18 U.S.C. § 3742 · 26 U.S.C. § 7202 · 28 U.S.C. § 994
Relies on Gall v. United States · Mistretta v. United States · Griggs v. Provident Consumer Discount Co. · United States National Bank v. Independent Insurance Agents of America, Inc. · Molina-Martinez v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“If the court of appeals determines that ... the sentence is outside the applicable guideline range and the district court failed to provide the required statement of reasons in the order of judgment and commitment ... it shall ... set aside the sentence and remand the case for further sentencing proceedings.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“ever affect the validity of an otherwise valid sentence,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.