Hamilton v. Pallozzi’s Empirical Analysis
848 F.3d 614 · 2017
Citation profile
3 federal appellate · 6 district · 2 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 922 (Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act) · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))
Relies on Williamson County Regional Planning Commission v. Hamilton Bank of Johnson City · Patsy v. Board of Regents of Fla. · Babbitt v. United Farm Workers National Union · District of Columbia v. Heller · McDonald v. City of Chicago
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“as recognized by the district court. A felon cannot be returned to the category of”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence“Justiciability is an issue of subject-matter jurisdiction.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“Although the particular statutes that Plaintiff violated are directed toward misappropriation of credit cards, the underlying misconduct is the kind of misconduct that the law has proscribed from time immemorial, Plaintiff’s crimes are not technical or regulatory offenses: they are- black-letter mala in se felonies reflecting grave misjudgment and maladjustment, While Plaintiff emphasizes the nonviolent nature of his crimes, studies show a statistically significant risk that persons who commit property crimes may engage in other maladaptive behaviors. For instance, a 2014 study published by the Bureau of Justice Statistics, which tracked' recidivism patterns of 404,638 state prisoners released in 2005, found that 82.1% of former property offenders were arrested for a new offense within five years following their release.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.