Jones v. Coleman’s Empirical Analysis
848 F.3d 744 · 2017
Citation profile
1 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))
Relies on Lujan v. Defenders of Wildlife · Younger v. Harris · Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp. · Colorado River Water Conservation District v. United States · Broadrick v. Oklahoma
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[T]he Supreme Court has repeatedly held that individuals or groups need not wait to be prosecuted for the exercise of First Amendment rights before they can bring a lawsuit, provided there is a”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“We imagine that the district court would have been hard-pressed to find an interpretation of this statute that satisfies the First Amendment.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Jones v. Haynes“fairly subject to an interpretation which will render unnecessary or substantially modify the federal constitutional question.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Hill v. Snyder
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.