Davis v. Ma’s Empirical Analysis
2012
Citation profile
2 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 12101 (§ 2 of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990) · 42 U.S.C. § 12102 (§ 3 of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990) · 42 U.S.C. § 12182 (§ 302 of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990)
Relies on Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. · Celotex Corporation v. Catrett H · Scott v. Harris · Tw Electrical Service Inc Nn v. Pacific Electrical Contractors Association · 54 Cal. 3d 868 - Christensen v. Superior Court
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“not a trained service dog ... under any circumstances according to minimal industry standards and practices”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Miller v. Corporaton“was not fully trained as a service animal, but had some 'basic obedience' training.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Miller v. Corporaton“not a certified service dog trainer based on industry standards.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Miller v. Corporaton
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.