Richardson v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2006
Citation profile
13
cited by 13 later decisions
1
states following
July 2017
most recently cited
13 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Terry v. Ohio · United States v. Leon · Mapp v. Ohio · Teague v. Lane · United States v. Arvizu
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Wilkins v. State · Lacey v. State“Under the state of the law as it existed at the time of the search of the trash, this search was not unreasonable and the marijuana was properly discovered evidence. Consequently, according to L.C. § 35-37-4-5, the evidence could not have been properly excluded and could provide support for the finding of probable cause to issue the warrant.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissente.g. Eshelman v. State“lacked any information that would allow police to corroborate the caller's claim that illegal activity was afoot”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. TS v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.