Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 848 SO2D 1272 - Johnson v. Johnson

Johnson v. Johnson’s Empirical Analysis

2003

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
1
states following
January 2019
most recently cited

9 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Butler v. State · Kipp v. Kipp · 821 So. 2d 350 - Delissio v. Delissio · 784 So. 2d 557 - McIlmoil v. McIlmoil

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[A]bsent evidence of the parties' intent to the contrary, the unambiguous language of the agreement should be interpreted according to its plain meaning.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.