848 So. 2d 287 - State v. McBride’s Empirical Analysis
2003
Citation profile
4 federal appellate · 1 district · 232 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 255 later decisions — most recently April 2024 · most notably & SC14-1266 & SC14-1305 Lewis Brooke Bartram v. U.S. Bank National Association, etc. & The Plantation at Ponte Vedra v. U.S. Bank National Association, etc. & Gideon M.G. Gratsiani v. U.S. Bank National Association, etc. (2016), 945 So. 2d 1216 - DADELAND DEPOT. v. St. Paul Fire and Marine (2006)
4 federal appellate · 1 district · 232 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Commissioner v. Sunnen · 630 So. 2d 521 - Hale v. State · 760 So. 2d 89 - Maddox v. State · Sylvester TIPLER, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. E. I. duPONT deNEMOURS AND CO., Inc., Defendant-Appellant · Dowling v. Finley Associates, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 255 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“), establishes that the former wife does not have a property interest in the EORT. The former wife asserts that in Carollo I, this Court determined that the EORT was a marital asset, thereby entitling the former wife to half. We agree with the former wife and affirm. The law of the case mandates that "questions of law actually decided on appeal must govern the case in the same court and the trial court, through all subsequent stages of the proceedings.”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage“has long recognized that res judicata will not be invoked where it would defeat the ends of justice”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage“[C]ollateral estoppel will not be invoked to bar relief where its application would result in a manifest injustice.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Bell v. State · Cillo v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.