Worley v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2003
Citation profile
21
cited by 21 later decisions
1
states following
October 2017
most recently cited
21 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 629 So. 2d 90 - Munoz v. State · 586 So. 2d 319 - State v. Hunter · 691 So. 2d 1068 - Lawrence v. State · 814 So. 2d 322 - Mora v. State · 438 So. 2d 436 - State v. Perez
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“While a defendant is entitled to have the jury instructed on his theory of defense, the failure to give special jury instructions does not constitute error where the instructions given adequately address the applicable legal standards. . . . Thus, [the defendant] has the burden of demonstrating that the trial court abused its discretion in giving standard instructions.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“The giving or withholding by a trial court of a requested jury instruction is reviewed under an abuse of discretion standard of review.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Denhart v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.