Hathorn v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1992
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 71 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 76 later decisions — most recently May 2018 · most notably Wesbrook v. State (2000), Lagrone v. State (1997)
1 federal appellate · 71 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Jackson v. Virginia · Chapman v. State of California · Faretta v. California · Jackson v. Denno
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 76 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“was not a comment on the weight of the evidence). The trial court's response also had no bearing on whether the jury should consider any aspects of Campos' testimony as mitigating, and it did not instruct the jury to disregard any mitigating aspects of Campos' testimony. Finally, the jury did not return its verdict until the day after the trial court responded to its note. The trial court's response had no improper effect on the jury's verdict; therefore, we find no”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Green v. State“Whenever two or more offenses have been consolidated or joined for trial under Section 3.02 [Consolidation and Joinder of Prosecutions], the defendant shall have a right to a severance of the offenses.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Sperling v. State“may contain as many separate paragraphs charging the same offense as is necessary to meet the contingencies of the evidence.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Callaway v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.