Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 848 SW2D 368 - Boozer v. State

Boozer v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1993

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
August 2002
most recently cited

6 state decisions

Appellate journey

reviewedthe decision below (from Texas 177th Judicial District Court)

Relationships

Relies on Almanza v. State · Geesa v. State · Cumbie v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Our holding in Geesa , namely that the reasonable doubt instruction “shall be submitted to the jury in all criminal cases, even in the absence of an objection or request by the State or the defendant, whether the evidence be circumstantial or direct,” created an absolute systemic requirement that cannot be waived or forfeited. Such requirements are not subject to a harm analysis.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.