Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 848 SW2D 785 - Reynolds v. State

Reynolds v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1993

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
1
states following
June 2016
most recently cited

12 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently June 2016

12 state decisions

80199320002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Pennhurst State School & Hospital v. Halderman · Briggs v. Connecticut · Johnson v. State · Madden v. State · O'BRYAN v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “While a party may cross-examine a character witness with relevant specific acts, the party may not prove that these acts occurred, if the only purpose is to test the character witness. Rule 405(a) states that “inquiry is allowable” into relevant specific instances of conduct. This language does not permit extrinsic proof of the conduct. The rationale is that the probative value of extrinsic proof of such a collateral matter is substantially outweighed by the risk of prejudice, confusion, and delay that the proof would present; after all, the bad act is only probative in these circumstances to test the character witness. It is not worth it, under the circumstances, to prove to the jury that this act really occurred.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “rule is to provide trial and appellate courts with a test for determining whether a prosecutor's”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.