King v. Staley’s Empirical Analysis
849 F.2d 1143 · 1988
Citation profile
13 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 22 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently November 2006
13 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Albemarle Paper Co. v. Moody · Franks v. Bowman Transportation Co. · Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Rath Packing Co. · Briseno v. Central Technical Community College Area
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“frustrate the central statutory purposes of eradicating discrimination throughout the economy and making persons whole for injuries suffered through past discrimination.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“A district court is obligated to grant a plaintiff who has been discriminated against on account of his [age] ... the most complete relief possible.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Tadlock v. Powell
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.