849 F.2d 1259
Docket No. 88-1774.
Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals
Submitted June 22, 1988. Decided June 29, 1988.
Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1988-06-29
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1705 · 18 U.S.C. § 3551 (Mandatory Victims Restitution Act of 1996) · 18 U.S.C. § 3742 · 18 U.S.C. § 844 · 28 U.S.C. § 994
Relies on Consumer Product Safety Commission v. GTE Sylvania, Inc. · Makuc v. American Honda Motor Co. · Redd v. Ingram
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1988-06-29
Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently April 2024
4 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
View the full empirical analysis of this case →
Before NELSON, NORRIS and HALL, Circuit Judges.
Appellant appeals from the district court's denial of Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(b) certification. However, the denial of Rule 54(b) certification is not appealable. See Makuc v. American Honda Motor Co., Inc., 692 F.2d 172, 174 (1st Cir.1982). Accordingly, appellee's motion to dismiss is granted.
Appellees' motion for an extension of time to file the answering brief is denied as moot.