Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 849 F.2d 1576 - Powell v. United States

Powell v. United States’s Empirical Analysis

849 F.2d 1576 · 1988

Citation profile

55
cited by 55 later decisions
2
states following
January 2024
most recently cited

30 federal appellate · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 55 later decisions — most recently January 2024 · most notably Fernandez-Montes v. Allied Pilots Ass'n (1993), Audrey Celestine Wilton Guillory

30 federal appellate · 2 state decisions

23019881990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 26 U.S.C. § 61 (Payment-in-Kind Tax Treatment Act of 1983)

Relies on Celotex Corporation v. Catrett H · Dayco Corp. v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. · St. Regis Paper Co. v. Royal Industries · Milburn v. United States · Harrington v. Vandalia-Butler Board of Education

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 55 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[E]rror in notice is harmless if the nonmoving party admits that he has no additional evidence anyway or if... the appellate court evaluates all of the nonmoving party's additional evidence and finds no genuine issue of material fact.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  2. “a summary judgment forecloses any future litigation of a case, the district court must give proper notice to insure that the nonmoving party had the opportunity to make every possible factual and legal argument.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[b]ecause settled precedent in this circuit bars entry of summary judgment without the ten days notice mandated by Fed.R.Civ.P. 56(c)”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.