Guzowski v. Hartman’s Empirical Analysis
849 F.2d 252 · 1988
Citation profile
20 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 33 later decisions — most recently December 2015 · most notably Craighead, Craighead v. E.F. Hutton & Co. (1990)
20 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 15 U.S.C. § 14 (§ 3 of the Clayton Antitrust Act of 1914) · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))
Relies on United Mine Workers of America v. Gibbs · Link v. Wabash Railroad · Federated Department Stores, Inc. v. Moitie · Local 408, International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. National Labor Relations Board · Padilla-Martinez v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 33 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[w]e note, however, that dismissal for failure to state a claim is without prejudice, and the Guzowskis are free to file a new complaint.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“precluded from bringing an action based upon one of the theories of recovery from the 1981 suit that was not appealed, but they are not precluded, in the course of litigating their claims in the 1984 suit, from litigating the facts upon which the earlier suit was based.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Nunn v. Bracey“It is well established that the sustaining of a motion to dismiss for insufficiency of the complaint serves as an adjudication on the merits unless the court specifies otherwise.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Nunn v. Bracey
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.