Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

849 F.2d 609

Docket No. 87-4073.

Folkes v. Janesz

This page is marked noindex.

Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1988-06-20

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Relies on Richard Hearns v. Norris W. McMackin

Decided 1988-06-20

Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Sixth Circuit.

Before LIVELY and JONES, Circuit Judges, and BAILEY BROWN, Senior Circuit Judge.

ORDER

¶1

This Ohio petitioner appeals the district court's judgment dismissing his petition for writ of habeas corpus filed under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254. The case has been referred to a panel of the court pursuant to Rule 9(a), Rules of the Sixth Circuit. Upon examination of the record and the briefs, this panel unanimously agrees that oral argument is not needed. Fed.R.App.P. 34(a).

¶2

Petitioner asserted eight grounds to support his claim that he was denied due process.

¶3

Upon review, we conclude the district court properly dismissed this suit. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of dismissal. Rule 9(b)(5), Rules of the Sixth Circuit.

/849/f2d/609 · .json · Public domain