United States v. Peralta’s Empirical Analysis
849 F.2d 625 · 1988
Citation profile
8 federal appellate · 13 district · 3 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 31 later decisions — most recently December 2020 · most notably United States v. Grant (1990), United States v. Dillon (1991)
8 federal appellate · 13 district · 3 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3142 (Bail Reform Act of 1984) · 21 U.S.C. § 841 (§ 401 of the Controlled Substances Act)
Relies on United States v. Salerno · Lawrence v. United States · United States v. Alatishe · Weaver v. United States · United States v. Simpkins
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 31 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“transcription of a detention hearing, if it evinces a clear and legally sufficient basis for the court's determination, will satisfy the requirement's of section 3142(i)”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“previously nonexistent, material information”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.