Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 849 F.2d 833 - United States v. Boyce

United States v. Boyce’s Empirical Analysis

849 F.2d 833 · 1988

Citation profile

36
cited by 36 later decisions
7
states following
July 2014
most recently cited

18 federal appellate · 2 district · 9 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 36 later decisions — most recently July 2014 · most notably State v. Schiappa (1999), United States v. Barone (1997)

18 federal appellate · 2 district · 9 state decisions

1701988199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2314 · 18 U.S.C. § 371 · 28 U.S.C. § 1651

Relies on Brown v. United States · Tisdale v. United States · United States v. Stratton · Crist v. Crist · United States v. Bailey

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 36 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the statement is so far contrary to his pecuniary, proprietary or penal interest that `a reasonable person in the declarant's position would not have made the statement unless believing it to be true,'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “the trustworthiness and reliability of the statement [is] corroborated by the `totality of circumstances' in the case,”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “`a sensitive analysis of the circumstances in which the statement was made and the precise nature of the statement.'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.