Young v. Guste’s Empirical Analysis
849 F.2d 970 · 1988
Citation profile
3 federal appellate · 4 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently June 2005
3 federal appellate · 4 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2253 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · Rose v. Lundy · Bowsher v. Merck & Co. · Walker v. United States · 404 So. 2d 239 - State v. Johnson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Establishing dominion or control requires proof such as the defendant's recent use of the drugs, his ownership of the premises where the drugs are found or his frequent or continuous proximity to the drugs.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Guzman v. Cm Lensing
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.