Technology Properties Ltd. v. Huawei Technologies Co.’s Empirical Analysis
849 F.3d 1349 · 2017
Citation profile
1 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1295 · 35 U.S.C. § 103
Relies on Teva Pharm. United States, Inc. v. Sandoz, Inc. · Fantasy Sports Properties, Inc. v. Sportsline.Com, Inc. · Norian Corporation v. Stryker Corporation · Elbex Video, Ltd. v. Sensormatic Electronics Corp. · Biogen Idec, Inc. v. GlaxoSmithKline LLC
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[t]he question is what a person of ordinary skill would understand the patentee to have disclaimed during prosecution, not what a person of ordinary skill would think the patentee needed to disclaim during prosecution.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.