United States v. Olson’s Empirical Analysis
849 F.3d 230 · 2017
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
November 2020
most recently cited
1 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Relies on United States v. Stevens · United States v. Wise · United States v. Ford · United States v. Tanksley · United States v. Valle-Montalbo
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“be in writing and designate the particular issues that are preserved for appeal; the government must consent to it; and the district court must approve it.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. United States v. Lim“enter into a conditional guilty plea preserving the right to appeal pretrial rulings.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. United States v. Lim“[a] conditional guilty plea may not be implied,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. United States v. Lim
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.