United States v. Galatis’s Empirical Analysis
849 F.3d 455 · 2017
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1347 (§ 242 of the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996) · 18 U.S.C. § 1349 (§ 902 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002) · 18 U.S.C. § 1957 (§ 1352 of the Money Laundering Control Act of 1986)
Relies on United States v. Duarte · United States v. Garcia · Nieves-Villanueva v. Soto-Rivera · United States v. Dworken · United States v. Lopez-Lopez
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“never purport[s] to tell the jury what the law mean[s],”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.