Robinson v. Worley’s Empirical Analysis
849 F.3d 577 · 2017
Citation profile
1 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 11 U.S.C. § 105 · 11 U.S.C. § 554 · 11 U.S.C. § 724 · 11 U.S.C. § 727
Relies on Anderson v. City of Bessemer City · Grogan v. Garner · Pepper v. Litton · Chalik v. Moorefield · Boroff v. Tully
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“To run afoul of this provision, 'the debtor must have made a statement under oath which he knew to be false, ... he must have made the statement willfully, with intent to defraud,' and the statement 'must have related to a material matter.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“A misstatement is material if it is 'relevant to the debtor's business transactions, estate and assets.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“when it should have been obvious to the debtor that his attorney was mistaken”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.